{ "archive_path": "archive/1757977388.146273", "base_url": "www.thebignewsletter.com/p/the-number-go-up-rule-why-america", "basename": "the-number-go-up-rule-why-america", "bookmarked_date": "2025-09-15 23:03", "canonical": { "archive_org_path": "https://web.archive.org/web/www.thebignewsletter.com/p/the-number-go-up-rule-why-america", "dom_path": "output.html", "favicon_path": "favicon.ico", "git_path": "git/", "google_favicon_path": "https://www.google.com/s2/favicons?domain=www.thebignewsletter.com", "headers_path": "headers.json", "htmltotext_path": "htmltotext.txt", "index_path": "index.html", "media_path": "media/", "mercury_path": "mercury/content.html", "pdf_path": "output.pdf", "readability_path": "readability/content.html", "screenshot_path": "screenshot.png", "singlefile_path": "singlefile.html", "warc_path": "warc/", "wget_path": null }, "domain": "www.thebignewsletter.com", "downloaded_at": "2025-09-15T23:03:13.899711+00:00", "downloaded_datestr": "2025-09-15 23:03", "extension": "", "hash": "FTHNSSK08QYHRW2W1H1N", "history": { "archive_org": [ { "cmd": [ "/usr/bin/curl", "--silent", "--location", "--compressed", "--proxy", "socks5://tor-socks-proxy:9150", "--head", "--max-time", "60", "--user-agent", "Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/128.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 ArchiveBox/{VERSION} (+https://github.com/ArchiveBox/ArchiveBox/)", "https://web.archive.org/save/https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/the-number-go-up-rule-why-america" ], "cmd_version": "8.10.1", "end_ts": "2025-09-15T23:04:17.133870+00:00", "index_texts": null, "output": "ArchiveError: Failed to find \"content-location\" URL header in Archive.org response.", "pwd": "/data/archive/1757977388.146273", "schema": "ArchiveResult", "start_ts": "2025-09-15T23:04:15.451011+00:00", "status": "failed" } ], "dom": [ { "cmd": [ "/usr/bin/chromium-browser", "--proxy-server=socks5://tor-socks-proxy:9150", "--disable-features=DarkMode", "--run-all-compositor-stages-before-draw", "--hide-scrollbars", "--autoplay-policy=no-user-gesture-required", "--no-first-run", "--use-fake-ui-for-media-stream", "--use-fake-device-for-media-stream", "--simulate-outdated-no-au='Tue, 31 Dec 2099 23:59:59 GMT'", "--headless=new", "--no-sandbox", "--no-zygote", "--disable-dev-shm-usage", "--disable-software-rasterizer", "--disable-sync", "--window-size=1440,2000", "--user-agent=Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/128.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 ArchiveBox/{VERSION} (+https://github.com/ArchiveBox/ArchiveBox/)", "--user-data-dir=/data/personas/Default/chrome_profile", "--profile-directory=Default", "--dump-dom", "https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/the-number-go-up-rule-why-america" ], "cmd_version": "131.0.6778", "end_ts": "2025-09-15T23:03:39.788302+00:00", "index_texts": null, "output": "output.html", "pwd": "/data/archive/1757977388.146273", "schema": "ArchiveResult", "start_ts": "2025-09-15T23:03:23.282928+00:00", "status": "succeeded" } ], "favicon": [ { "cmd": [ "/usr/bin/curl", "--silent", "--location", "--compressed", "--proxy", "socks5://tor-socks-proxy:9150", "--max-time", "60", "--output", "favicon.ico", "--user-agent", "Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/128.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 ArchiveBox/{VERSION} (+https://github.com/ArchiveBox/ArchiveBox/)", "https://www.google.com/s2/favicons?domain=www.thebignewsletter.com" ], "cmd_version": "8.10.1", "end_ts": "2025-09-15T23:03:18.412297+00:00", "index_texts": null, "output": "favicon.ico", "pwd": "/data/archive/1757977388.146273", "schema": "ArchiveResult", "start_ts": "2025-09-15T23:03:14.629144+00:00", "status": "succeeded" } ], "git": [], "headers": [ { "cmd": [ "/usr/bin/curl", "--silent", "--location", "--compressed", "--proxy", "socks5://tor-socks-proxy:9150", "--head", "--max-time", "60", "--user-agent", "Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/128.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 ArchiveBox/{VERSION} (+https://github.com/ArchiveBox/ArchiveBox/)", "https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/the-number-go-up-rule-why-america" ], "cmd_version": "8.10.1", "end_ts": "2025-09-15T23:03:18.851413+00:00", "index_texts": null, "output": "headers.json", "pwd": "/data/archive/1757977388.146273", "schema": "ArchiveResult", "start_ts": "2025-09-15T23:03:18.444871+00:00", "status": "succeeded" } ], "htmltotext": [ { "cmd": [ "(internal) archivebox.extractors.htmltotext", "./{singlefile,dom}.html" ], "cmd_version": "0.8.5rc51", "end_ts": "2025-09-15T23:04:02.118264+00:00", "index_texts": [ "(https://substackcdn.com) (https://substackcdn.com/bundle/theme/main.0ac739e4cd11def2b60c.css) (https://substackcdn.com/bundle/static/css/5340.f3fb3430.css) (https://substackcdn.com/bundle/static/css/1832.83911eac.css) (https://substackcdn.com/bundle/static/css/main.b8ef093a.css) (https://substackcdn.com/bundle/static/css/3689.bccae000.css) (https://substackcdn.com/bundle/static/css/9500.8f3e7b80.css) (https://substackcdn.com/bundle/static/css/1481.8fbd7ad5.css) (https://substackcdn.com/bundle/static/css/5758.602fd321.css) (https://substackcdn.com/bundle/static/css/2168.e5e7381a.css) (https://substackcdn.com/bundle/static/css/9257.30d1b4ad.css) (https://substackcdn.com/bundle/static/css/6721.a960d36f.css) The Number Go Up Rule: Why America Refuses to Fix Anything (https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/the-number-go-up-rule-why-america) (https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!PAE6!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fb98ab605-be40-4612-8493-dd79bce9c716%2Ffavicon.ico) (https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!9OnY!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fb98ab605-be40-4612-8493-dd79bce9c716%2Ffavicon-16x16.png) (https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!H2_G!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fb98ab605-be40-4612-8493-dd79bce9c716%2Ffavicon-32x32.png) (https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!foQf!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fb98ab605-be40-4612-8493-dd79bce9c716%2Fapple-touch-icon-57x57.png) (https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!KVol!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fb98ab605-be40-4612-8493-dd79bce9c716%2Fapple-touch-icon-60x60.png) (https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!Bz7E!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fb98ab605-be40-4612-8493-dd79bce9c716%2Fapple-touch-icon-72x72.png) (https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!h5iK!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fb98ab605-be40-4612-8493-dd79bce9c716%2Fapple-touch-icon-76x76.png) (https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!cpWV!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fb98ab605-be40-4612-8493-dd79bce9c716%2Fapple-touch-icon-114x114.png) (https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!0g06!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fb98ab605-be40-4612-8493-dd79bce9c716%2Fapple-touch-icon-120x120.png) (https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!Hi_h!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fb98ab605-be40-4612-8493-dd79bce9c716%2Fapple-touch-icon-144x144.png) (https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!p0tb!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fb98ab605-be40-4612-8493-dd79bce9c716%2Fapple-touch-icon-152x152.png) (https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!oleH!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fb98ab605-be40-4612-8493-dd79bce9c716%2Fapple-touch-icon-167x167.png) (https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!G4Rz!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fb98ab605-be40-4612-8493-dd79bce9c716%2Fapple-touch-icon-180x180.png) (https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!Ldwp!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fb98ab605-be40-4612-8493-dd79bce9c716%2Fapple-touch-icon-1024x1024.png) (/feed) (BIG by Matt Stoller) (https://substackcdn.com/bundle/theme/main.0ac739e4cd11def2b60c.css) (https://substackcdn.com/bundle/static/css/async/4918.b663e246.css) (https://substackcdn.com/bundle/static/css/async/3894.216e944d.css) (https://substackcdn.com/bundle/static/css/async/2130.f881b28f.css) (https://substackcdn.com/bundle/static/css/async/3280.8db3c09e.css) (/) (BIG by Matt Stoller) (/) BIG by Matt Stoller Subscribe Sign in (Close) (User) (User's avatar) Discover more from BIG by Matt Stoller The history and politics of monopoly power. Over 164,000 subscribers (Enter your email...) Subscribe By subscribing, I agree to Substack's (https://substack.com/tos) Terms of Use , and acknowledge its (https://substack.com/ccpa#personal-data-collected) Information Collection Notice and (https://substack.com/privacy) Privacy Policy . Already have an account? Sign in The Number Go Up Rule: Why America Refuses to Fix Anything In the Booming Twenties, all decision-making is about protecting the value of financial assets held by older people. Therefore, the number must go up. And nothing else matters. (https://substack.com/@mattstoller) Matt Stoller Jul 18, 2025 782 (https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/the-number-go-up-rule-why-america/comments) 93 205 Share Yesterday, the Wall Street Journal dropped a (https://www.wsj.com/politics/trump-jeffrey-epstein-birthday-letter-we-have-certain-things-in-common-f918d796?mod=hp_lead_pos7) salacious story involving the relationship between Jeff Epstein and Donald Trump, one that is throwing the political world into a tizzy. And for good reason, it speaks to a two tier system of justice. One class in America is composed of billionaires and elites with super-yachts and no accountability, the other is composed of the rest of us who have to deal with increasingly enshittified goods and services. Just take a look at another headlines of the Wall Street Journal yesterday, and you\u2019ll notice in this headline the flip side of the Epstein story. (https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!VVU3!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F4314ccd5-b4cc-41ee-aa9b-79b19bdec6e9_652x257.png) () Health care in America is insanely expensive, unpredictable, and often low quality. And yet it\u2019s going to get far pricier next year, largely because a network of monopolistic middlemen are pushing up costs. There\u2019s a gossipy angle here - Diddy (https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13916955/diddy-sean-combs-list-accomplices-lawyer.html) apparently had pharmaceutical executives at his creepy events. But it\u2019s the impact on ordinary people that matters. Despite decades of popular anger, we just can\u2019t seem to do anything about health care costs and the people who foist them on us. Two other headlines from the WSJ yesterday are also worth mentioning. First, rail giant Union Pacific is (https://www.wsj.com/business/deals/railroad-operator-union-pacific-exploring-deal-for-norfolk-southern-1d06e822?mod=lead_feature_below_a_pos3) considering buying Norfolk Southern, a historically important merger would harm farmers and shippers, and push up prices of food, energy, and a whole set of goods on which we rely. And second, Chevron is (https://www.wsj.com/business/energy-oil/chevron-moves-forward-with-megadeal-for-hess-after-winning-exxon-arbitration-17347067?mod=hp_lead_pos1) closing its deal for Hess, completing the consolidation of the oil sector, and they are going to move engineering work to India. Things in America, in other words, are getting worse, very quickly, for most of us, while a small group does quite well. The Epstein saga is just a gossipy way to convey that narrative. The question I want to ask in this piece is why that is. I started BIG in 2019 to describe the anti-monopoly movement, to get our thoughts out there. And it\u2019s been an unexpectedly successful journey: I didn\u2019t expect Biden to revive antitrust law, but he did, or for our ideas to be accepted, but they were. There are now monopolization cases against Apple, Amazon, Google, Ticketmaster, Meta, RealPage, John Deere, and so forth. I didn\u2019t think that Lina Khan would become a celebrity, or that millions of people would learn what the Federal Trade Commission is. And yet, over the past six months, that ascent has paused. The old enemy of equality - cynicism - has hit back, and hit back hard. We accomplished a lot over the last decade, but the basic architecture of American politics remains in place. And that architecture is characterized by one rule involving the stock market. The number must go up. That rule is ironclad, and it explains why things are increasingly enshittified. If you understand it, it will help predict what politicians like Donald Trump and business people like Apple CEO Tim Cook will do. The reason behind the rule is simple. The biggest generation in American history, the baby boomers, are still in power. Boomers (https://money.com/wealthiest-generation-baby-boomers/) have in aggregate $80-100 trillion in financial assets, far more than any other group. As a result they are culturally and politically dominant. The average American (https://www.bfadvisors.com/7-stats-billionaires/?utm_source=chatgpt.com) billionaire is a boomer in his early 60s. Donald Trump is a boomer, most of his key advisors are boomers, so is Democratic Senate chief Chuck Schumer. Key business leaders - like Apple CEO Tim Cook and JP Morgan CEO Jamie Dimon - are boomers, as are most CEOs of Hollywood studios, who have traditionally skewed younger. The (https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2021/01/15/ceo-succession-practices-in-the-russell-3000-and-sp-500/?utm_source=chatgpt.com) average S&P 500 CEO is in his late 50s, and the number of young people (https://news.bloomberglaw.com/esg/board-directors-skew-older-as-companies-loosen-age-constraints?utm_source=chatgpt.com) serving on corporate boards keeps going down. (https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!7DHb!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fb73d0b6b-6322-46da-a41d-7342de5b7d17_623x374.png) () Asset control and power in America is centered among old people with lots of assets. And they associate protecting the stock market with protecting America. The \u201cnumber go up\u201d rule is not a story of greed or economics, it\u2019s a story of how we make decisions as a society. Take the pandemic. Some of you might remember that right before Covid hit in force, I was (https://www.wired.com/story/covid-19-will-mark-the-end-of-affluence-politics/) freaking out . I pay attention to China, and it wasn\u2019t hard to imagine that a contagious disease would come here, and that the U.S. wouldn\u2019t handle it well, given thin supply chains and corrupt institutions. That seems obvious now, but at the time I was considered a little nuts. There was a moment, however, when the panic set in. And it wasn\u2019t when public health experts issued any warnings or when elected leaders spoke. It was when the stock market went down. Think about what that means. Covid was a giant society altering disease that forced multi-trillion dollar society-altering decisions while in the dark about its severity. And yet, until it became clear that it would affect capitalization of financial markets, it was not worth thinking about. Finance has become the lens through which our elites understand what is and is not a problem. If it affects \u201cnumber go up,\u201d it\u2019s worth solving. If not, it\u2019s just whining. Increasing the capitalization of the stock market at all costs has a number of implications about how our society works. Anything hindering short-term increases in profits, whether that\u2019s higher wages, more factory investment, ending tax loopholes, rules to block being able to unsubscribe from Planet Fitness, transitioning to different energy sources, addressing an opioid crisis, or breaking Chinese control over the necessities of life, gets pushed out of the way. American life spans have plateaued or stagnated since 2015, which you\u2019d think would be of concern. But it\u2019s just not. There\u2019s also something that distinguishes standard financial capitalism from \u2018number go up.\u2019 Financial capitalism implies risk. But in our era, the government guarantees financial returns with subsidies, regulations and bailouts. It\u2019s a form of statecraft. The observation of \u2018number go up\u2019 as a powerful guidepost for America is not original. Odd Lots host Joe Wiesenthal has often made this point, fingering the primacy of finance as the reason why America does not produce more housing or manufactured goods domestically. \u201cA stock market that continues to go up is part of the entire US economic model,\u201d he (https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2025-03-24/i-want-to-believe-in-abundance) wrote . \u201cRising stocks are how we pay for retirement, education, consumption, and so forth\u2026 any impulse to abundantly build out less profitable lines of business undoubtedly strikes at the heart of how American capitalism works.\u201d Probably the most popular formulation of the \u2018number go up rule\u2019 is a famous (https://www.insidehook.com/culture/story-tom-toro-new-yorker-climate-cartoon) New Yorker cartoon from 2012 showing children around a fire in a post-apocalyptic scene, with the caption \u201cYes, the planet got destroyed. But for a beautiful moment in time we created a lot of value for shareholders.\u201d As it turns out, Donald Trump obeys the number go up rule religiously. I watch CNBC every day, and from 9am to 10am, anchor Jim Cramer goes off on rants about the world. Based on conversations I\u2019ve had with people who know him, Cramer is a corrupt cynic who plays a character on TV. He name drops and talks to an endless number of CEOs, lavishing them publicly with praise, while attacking regulators who won\u2019t be his sources. Big business leaders understand that Cramer is speaking in code, saying publicly what they want out there. He lies, dissembles, makes terrible predictions, but he\u2019s the raw id of capital, and the perfect spokesman for this moment of baby boomer-run high finance dominance. During the Biden era, Cramer, like his counterparts at the Wall Street Journal editorial page, spent a lot of time attacking FTC Chair Lina Khan, because Khan was terrifying CEOs. It\u2019s not that she was doing much to harm them, she just didn\u2019t treat them differently than she treated anyone else. Big business leaders are used to being buttered up, being believed just because of who they are, having their banal observations taken as gospel. In meetings, Khan had the temerity to actually take them seriously, and ask for evidence or to respond to holes in their arguments. And they reacted with a collective, \u201cDo you know who I am?\u201d These days, Cramer is practically jumping out of his chair with excitement. He is praising Trump, and explaining that Wall Street bankers tell him privately, off the record, that they think Trump is doing a great job. The most important prop to the stock market, he said, is that mergers are back on. \u201cAnyone can merge with anyone,\u201d he said joyfully. I doubt he knows the names of Trump antitrust enforcers, because they don\u2019t matter, and that\u2019s how things should be. One irony in Cramer\u2019s hatred of Khan is that Joe Biden obeyed the \u201cnumber go up\u201d mantra. His bank regulators bailed out Silicon Valley Bank, and the stock markets hit record highs, as Fed Chair Jay Powell and Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen did whatever they could to ensure that number go up. It was only in the corner of the world involving antitrust where that rule seemed to not apply. Still, that rule was poised to smash into antitrust; Kamala Harris was likely to fire Khan had she won the Presidency. When Trump was running for President in 2024, his framework was to increase tariffs, deport people en masse, all as a way to re-industrialize and hike wages. This model would (https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/tariffs-low-prices-wall-street-pick) fail , I believed, unless he was willing to accept that the stock market would have to go down. Someone had to absorb the costs of paying people more and building more factories, and that would have to occur through lower profits. In the first four or five months of his administration, I was surprised that Trump actually seemed serious, empowering advisors like Peter Navarro to engage in real protectionist policies. It was sloppy, but it was real. The markets went down, Wall Street panicked, and Trump seemed to enjoy it. \u201cSometimes you have to take medicine to fix something,\u201d he (https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/trump-tells-americans-to-be-patient-as-global-markets-keep-dropping-over-tariffs) said . Had that attitude continued, the number go up paradigm would have been broken, and a host of problems previously considered just whining - like high health care costs and low quality - would have become solveable. But in April, Trump changed course. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick (https://www.wsj.com/politics/policy/trump-tariff-pause-navarro-bessent-lutnick-b9e864fb?gaa_at=eafs&gaa_n=ASWzDAiy31U4U6XAubbCxoldB0i1njEnXrRmRct34YYufSE37MYUVMy_L2Le0c9uvuU%3D&gaa_ts=68790ac7&gaa_sig=ywaCxJBA3ReB_HjC61JshE6Fqik9J5V1oljAlkQ1B64WSAIZ6wH4dL54LXHkcATkqzDnqr76Qhn05ZOWhfHckQ%3D%3D) won an internal fight with Navarro, and ever since then, it\u2019s been Bessent running point on trade and economics, with Lutnick getting closer and closer to eliminating all antitrust action against big tech firms. It\u2019s not just economic policy, either. During the recent fights in the Middle East, the United States, Iran, and Israel were all extremely careful not to disturb financial markets. Today, no one on Wall Street thinks Trump is serious about hindering profits. As Cramer said, privately they note that they love this administration. Ultimately, number go up is a statement about what we value as a society. For hundreds of years, the key phrase describing value in America was the \u201cfruits of your labor,\u201d meaning that we understood it was from labor, came value. I noted this in my (https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/a-fourth-of-july-question-can-america) July 4th post , showing the history of American disdain for high finance, precisely because we believed that dignity meant respecting people who work for a living. \u201cLabor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration,\u201d said Abraham Lincoln in justifying the Union side in the Civil War. A key part of that framework was fostering a fair return on capital, which meant that people should make money from investments, but not too much. Too low meant no investment, but too high a return meant that we were allowing extraction from working people, which, if you look around, is exactly what a high stock market is doing. Ticketmaster\u2019s stock price is based on taking more from audience members and artists than it should get, just as UnitedHealth Group extracts from both doctors and patients. Today, our leaders see market capitalization as good, instead of a sign of weakness. It\u2019s not just Donald Trump, whose policy framework basically seems to be moving as much capital as possible into data centers, in the hopes that will keep number going up. Here\u2019s Silicon Valley Democrat Ro Khanna, bragging about multi-trillion dollar firms in his district. (https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!mxFZ!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F85549b99-e9a8-40fc-8696-fdb26d64c4da_578x312.png) () Rather than understand excessive returns as extractive, he thinks high finance is good. I don\u2019t mean to pick on Khanna, he\u2019s smart, but it\u2019s precisely because he\u2019s smart that his arguments expose the real values at work. Number must go up. The number go up model moment reminds me of the archival research I did on the roaring 1920s, with its deep reservoir of fatigue at the idea of do-gooderism, at the prevalence of scams, gambling, liquor, and celebrated immorality, with a backdrop of a financial market moving endlessly higher. Only this time, the 2020s is run by baby boomers who are protecting their financial assets. So we should probably call it the Booming Twenties. Two other deeply corrupt trends characterize what is turning into a very wicked and evil time. The first is crypto, and the second is the widespread legalization of gambling. I said my piece about crypto in 2021 - it\u2019s a (https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/cryptocurrencies-a-necessary-scam) necessary scam , similar to the Florida land value speculation of the 1920s. Crypto is not a useful technology, it\u2019s a bet on disillusionment and corruption, a belief in hustle bro culture. I know lobbyists for crypto, and they are deeply cynical, often full of rage at people who do not accept dirty money and seek to build a moral society based on political equality. I thought crypto would go away after Sam Bankman-Fried went to jail, but Biden SEC Chair Gary Gensler (https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/speeches-statements/gensler-statement-spot-bitcoin-011023) approved a massive inflow of cash into bitcoin, and that was that. Crypto is a good metaphor for the 2020s, because it is pure speculation. The financial derivatives that led to the 2008 crisis were too far from real business activity, referencing mortgages or corporate bonds. But crypto references nothing at all, just memes. Largely because of hundreds of millions of dollars of campaign contributions, mostly to Republicans, it is now a multi-trillion dollar financial system that will end in tears. Private equity and big tech are bigger and more extractive than crypto, but is floating along the same cultural trend line of \u201cnumber go up.\u201d \u201cWhen the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino,\u201d economist and philosopher John Maynard Keynes once wrote, \u201cthe job is likely to be ill-done.\u201d That was true in the 1920s, it\u2019s true today. Another signpost is the widespread acceptance of corporate \u201capp based\u201d gambling, which is destroying the lives of millions of people. We\u2019re not talking about making a bet with a friend on a game, or playing a round of poker, we\u2019re talking highly extractive sophisticated corporations spending billions of dollars, geo-targeting addicts with advertising. They are preying on teenagers, and financing and corrupting the entire apparatus of what used to be a collective shared cultural commons - sports. And yet, there\u2019s virtually no opposition to systemized gambling, even from the church. A society under \u201cnumber go up\u201d tends towards evil. The men and women behind an excessively high rate of return often make deeply sinful and immoral choices, little different than the Confederate plantation owners did in whipping slaves or lords in castles did when abusing serfs. That they do it with spreadsheets doesn\u2019t make it better. (We even use old terminology: I know of several people in a large health insurance conglomerate who set policies to deny care whose nickname is \u201cthe three witches.\u201d) And that\u2019s why Jeff Epstein\u2019s story is so compelling, it expresses this evil in a way that we all understand. On Sunday, I wrote about the (https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/monopoly-round-up-jeff-epstein-maga) oddness of the story , how an elite sex trafficker convicted of procuring children as prostitutes was friends or associates with everyone from Trump to Bill Clinton to Larry Summers to Bill Gates. Epstein represents how elites live in one moral universe where evil bacchanalia is rampant, while the rest of us live in a different more normal one. Every society has elites, and there are always weird things that elites do. But America, and the West, have reached a point where there is increasingly deep resentment and cynicism about this divide. \u201cNumber go up\u201d will end. Everything does. It will likely end in a giant crash or real war, but there are peaceful political offramps, since it is not very popular. In 2006, 2008, 2010, 2014, 2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, and 2024, Americans voted for change. A month ago, young people in New York City elected a Democratic socialist as their mayoral candidate who said billionaires should not exist, which is a very clear revolt against a system where wealth is held by a few people in older generations. High rents and a high cost of living might help market capitalization, but they are, to most people, problems. We\u2019ve done it before, and recently. Throughout the 20th century, key challenges to equality had to do with racism, or sexism, or homophobia. There were just lots of bad things - like harassing secretaries - that were understood as the way things were. It\u2019s not that all of that behavior is over, any more than we have stopped all theft or murder, but the social norms have changed. In the early 1990s, fewer than half of Americans (https://news.gallup.com/poll/354638/approval-interracial-marriage-new-high.aspx) approved of interracial marriage between blacks and whites. Just a decade later, it was 76%, today it\u2019s 96%. Something similar likely happened with gay marriage, and opposition to sexual harassment in the work place. We overcame our long and horrible lack of belief in social equality, one that bedeviled us since the 1700s. The new moral challenge we have as a society is, in a sense, a much older one. We have to get back to seeing the vices laid out in most ancient religious traditions - gambling, speculation, greed, and a disdain for those who work for a living. As FDR (https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/address-madison-square-garden-new-york-city-1) put it in 1936, \u201cWe had to struggle with the old enemies of peace\u2014business and financial monopoly, speculation, reckless banking, class antagonism, sectionalism, war profiteering.\u201d As we organize for that time, building the arguments and the coalitions, understand that the one ironclad rule guiding elite decision-making in the Booming Twenties is number go up. That runs our social order, and that\u2019s what we\u2019re really up against. (https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!cXcZ!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fd6b580ae-e76a-4095-94ed-302aae09aeed_465x464.jpeg) (Jeffrey Epstein details close relationship with Trump in newly released tapes | Donald Trump | The Guardian) (Jeffrey Epstein details close relationship with Trump in newly released tapes | Donald Trump | The Guardian) Thanks for reading! Your tips make this newsletter what it is, so please send me tips on weird monopolies, stories I\u2019ve missed, or other thoughts. And if you liked this issue of BIG, you can sign up (http://email.mg1.substack.com/c/eJxVUMFuwyAM_ZpwjIAmYT34UHXtb0QEnBSNQARmVf5-pN1hkyzberae37PRhEtMOxBmYiVjGp0FZoEradTEXB7nhLhq54FtZfLOaHIxHFtC9LJjDzhxNUs7nKTlnGsthRKDmj-s4dIYO0i2xUyjLtZhMAj4jWmPAZmHB9GWm9OlkfcaqybKFL3H1OYyZdLmqzVxraMn-togcyC5OPNzzT3ve9WKVnS3y5WL4a54d1PdZ9PxdRH_CFiCX946XA4vL7TaGWtdS3C0jxj05NECpYKM3v94Cad9Qwj4zB6JML3Bw74chFCsHrKxcgb4o_8H-RJ1Kg) here for more issues, a newsletter on how to restore fair commerce, innovation, and democracy. Consider becoming a (https://email.mg1.substack.com/c/eJxVUMtuwyAQ_JpwtABjEw4ceulvIB6Lg4rBgrUq_31J0kO7Wmk1-xrNeIuw1XZphI7kqB0NXgfoAt89AyI0cnZoJgVNgqaSe-lI6iY2gN2mrMlxupy8xVTLc4uxhQvy0DZKpyjQIL31CqigggOPQYWBIqg3lz1DguJB15Ivc9gUSNYPxKPf5o8b_xy5W8SONWdoUz9dR-u_Jl_3MXpC35IDkjSnnI2Y6cwkZROfhIwuSrXauC7e2_u0rNhtvJaboPvG_v0iTf9SjOH21PXqDmlm1P0sCS8DxboMQWM7geDbsJcHZoMCbRgZjEXN1nmVchaci5W9VQ5bxEzlXVFFBm2o46roP8J-AJJ0hnE) paying subscriber to support this work, or if you are a paying subscriber, giving a (https://email.mg1.substack.com/c/eJxVUEtuxSAMPE1YRnwSSBYsKlW9BiJgUlQCETiqcvvy3uuitSxZ9tgezTiLsJd6a4SG5CwNDd4n6AzfLQEiVHI1qCZ6Tbymiju1kdhMqACHjUmT89pSdBZjyY8txmY-kU_tOZOU-bB5urhl9ouc-RomtnoXpOX0xWUvHyE70CWn25w2epL0J-LZBvE28I-eh0VsWFKCOrZra2jd1-jK0aFH62rcYBB9U-4x4CDesV5AouaUsx6CCqYoG_k4qbAFtUob5OycXcZZYrPhnoeJHjv795xU_cvZwf0h9DntWk2vx5Uj3gay3RJ4_STEl4NPU8wOGWp31huLmkkhlRIT55NkL9ndp0lQtax0JZ3Wl36V9R-lPyvjiqk) gift subscription to a friend, colleague, or family member. If you really liked it, read my book, (https://www.simonandschuster.com/books/Goliath/Matt-Stoller/9781501183089) Goliath: The 100-Year War Between Monopoly Power and Democracy . cheers, Matt Stoller Subscribe to BIG by Matt Stoller Thousands of paid subscribers The history and politics of monopoly power. (https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/the-number-go-up-rule-why-america) (https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/the-number-go-up-rule-why-america) (https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/the-number-go-up-rule-why-america) (post-end-cta) (Type your email...) Subscribe By subscribing, I agree to Substack's (https://substack.com/tos) Terms of Use , and acknowledge its (https://substack.com/ccpa#personal-data-collected) Information Collection Notice and (https://substack.com/privacy) Privacy Policy . (https://substack.com/profile/111507320-sue-sedory) (Sue Sedory) (Sue Sedory's avatar) (https://substack.com/profile/30337457-monnina) (Monnina) (Monnina's avatar) (https://substack.com/profile/29353584-samoan62) (samoan62) (samoan62's avatar) (https://substack.com/profile/56183712-greta) (Greta) (Greta's avatar) (https://substack.com/profile/759128-matt-stoller) (Matt Stoller) (Matt Stoller's avatar) 782 Likes \u2219(https://substack.com/note/p-168396972/restacks?utm_source=substack&utm_content=facepile-restacks) 205 Restacks 782 (https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/the-number-go-up-rule-why-america/comments) 93 205 Share Discussion about this post Comments Restacks (User) (User's avatar) (Write a comment...) (https://substack.com/profile/3258638-jerome-a-paris?utm_source=comment) (J\u00e9r\u00f4me \u00e0 Paris) (J\u00e9r\u00f4me \u00e0 Paris's avatar) (https://substack.com/profile/3258638-jerome-a-paris?utm_source=substack-feed-item) J\u00e9r\u00f4me \u00e0 Paris (https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/the-number-go-up-rule-why-america/comment/136546326) (Jul 18, 2025, 3:24 PM) Jul 18 Liked by Matt Stoller Until the 70s, the stock market and median wages moved in parallel. Since that, one has go ever higher while the other has been semi-stagnant. That's when the financial world move from wealth creation to wealth capture. We have 40 years of policies to unwind. Expand full comment Like (74) Reply Share (https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/the-number-go-up-rule-why-america/comment/136546326) 1 reply (https://substack.com/profile/15090254-joshua-hughes?utm_source=comment) (Joshua Hughes) (Joshua Hughes's avatar) (https://substack.com/profile/15090254-joshua-hughes?utm_source=substack-feed-item) Joshua Hughes (https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/the-number-go-up-rule-why-america/comment/136541786) (Jul 18, 2025, 3:11 PM) Jul 18 Liked by Matt Stoller Public pensions and 401Ks are continuously, monotonously, passively funded by employees, money mindlessly going to the biggest, most monopolistic and ossified companies--that's not efficient allocation of capital. Plus all the opaque private equity funds with valuations completely divorced from the assets they hold, never mind that they are systematically destroying once profitable companies, selling assets from under them, with almost no risk to the firms brokering these deals. We are heading for a reckoning, though the biggest losers will of course not be those doing all the damage to our country. Expand full comment Like (67) Reply Share (https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/the-number-go-up-rule-why-america/comment/136541786) 2 replies (https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/the-number-go-up-rule-why-america/comments) 91 more comments... Top Latest Discussions (https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/an-assassin-showed-just-how-angry) An Assassin Showed Just How Angry America Really Is (https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/an-assassin-showed-just-how-angry) The murder of UnitedHealth Care CEO Brian Thompson was brutal. The reactions were telling. Elite disdain for the rule of law is leading to a society\u2026 Dec 6, 2024 \u2022 (https://substack.com/@mattstoller) Matt Stoller 1,873 (https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/an-assassin-showed-just-how-angry/comments) 94 () (https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/did-a-private-equity-fire-truck-roll) Did a Private Equity Fire Truck Roll-Up Worsen the L.A. Fires? (https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/did-a-private-equity-fire-truck-roll) During the LA fires, dozens of fire trucks sat in the boneyard, waiting for repairs the city couldn't afford. Why? A private equity roll-up made\u2026 Jan 25 \u2022 (https://substack.com/@baselmusharbash) Basel Musharbash 703 (https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/did-a-private-equity-fire-truck-roll/comments) 27 () (https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/monopoly-round-up-the-democrats-corporate) Monopoly Round-Up: The Democrats' Corporate Lawyers Get the Humiliation They Deserve (https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/monopoly-round-up-the-democrats-corporate) The Democratic establishment brain was at the giant law firm Paul Weiss. They just bent the knee to Trump. Plus, tennis players revolt, and Google\u2026 Mar 24 \u2022 (https://substack.com/@mattstoller) Matt Stoller 354 (https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/monopoly-round-up-the-democrats-corporate/comments) 63 () See all Ready for more? (https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/the-number-go-up-rule-why-america) () (https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/the-number-go-up-rule-why-america) (https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/the-number-go-up-rule-why-america) () (subscribe_footer) (Type your email...) Subscribe \u00a9 2025 Matt Stoller (https://substack.com/privacy) Privacy \u2219 (https://substack.com/tos) Terms \u2219 (https://substack.com/ccpa#personal-data-collected) Collection notice (https://substack.com/signup?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=web&utm_content=footer) Start writing (https://substack.com/app/app-store-redirect?utm_campaign=app-marketing&utm_content=web-footer-button) Get the app (https://substack.com) Substack is the home for great culture Cookie Policy We use cookies to improve your experience, for analytics, and for marketing. You can accept, reject, or manage your preferences. See our (https://substack.com/tos) privacy policy . Manage Reject Accept Create your profile (User) (User's avatar) Name* (Type your name...) Email* (Enter your email address...) Handle (Type your handle...) Bio (Say something about yourself...) Subscribe to the newsletter (/p/the-number-go-up-rule-why-america) (false) I agree to Substack's (https://substack.com/tos) Terms of Use , and acknowledge its (https://substack.com/ccpa#personal-data-collected) Information Collection Notice and (https://substack.com/privacy) Privacy Policy . Save and post comment Only paid subscribers can comment on this post (https://www.thebignewsletter.com/subscribe?simple=true&next=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.thebignewsletter.com%2Fp%2Fthe-number-go-up-rule-why-america&utm_source=paywall&utm_medium=web&utm_content=168396972) Subscribe (https://substack.com/sign-in?redirect=%2Fp%2Fthe-number-go-up-rule-why-america&for_pub=mattstoller&change_user=false) Already a paid subscriber? Sign in This site requires JavaScript to run correctly. Please (https://enable-javascript.com/) turn on JavaScript or unblock scripts " ], "output": "htmltotext.txt", "pwd": "/data/archive/1757977388.146273", "schema": "ArchiveResult", "start_ts": "2025-09-15T23:04:01.957323+00:00", "status": "succeeded" } ], "media": [ { "cmd": [ "/usr/local/bin/yt-dlp", "--restrict-filenames", "--trim-filenames", "128", "--write-description", "--write-info-json", "--write-annotations", "--write-thumbnail", "--no-call-home", "--write-sub", "--write-auto-subs", "--convert-subs=srt", "--yes-playlist", "--continue", "--no-abort-on-error", "--ignore-errors", "--geo-bypass", "--add-metadata", "--format=(bv*+ba/b)[filesize<=750m][filesize_approx<=?750m]/(bv*+ba/b)", "--skip-download", "--cache-dir=/data/yt-dlp-cache/", "--cookies=/data/yt-dlp-cache/cookies.txt", "--proxy=socks5://tor-socks-proxy:9150", "--no-playlist", "https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/the-number-go-up-rule-why-america" ], "cmd_version": "2024.10.7", "end_ts": "2025-09-15T23:04:15.350008+00:00", "index_texts": [], "output": "ArchiveError: Failed to save media", "pwd": "/data/archive/1757977388.146273", "schema": "ArchiveResult", "start_ts": "2025-09-15T23:04:04.806363+00:00", "status": "failed" } ], "mercury": [ { "cmd": [ "/home/archivebox/.npm/bin/postlight-parser", "https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/the-number-go-up-rule-why-america" ], "cmd_version": "2.2.3", "end_ts": "2025-09-15T23:04:01.881449+00:00", "index_texts": null, "output": "mercury/", "pwd": "/data/archive/1757977388.146273", "schema": "ArchiveResult", "start_ts": "2025-09-15T23:03:57.390916+00:00", "status": "succeeded" } ], "pdf": [], "readability": [ { "cmd": [ "/home/archivebox/.npm/bin/readability-extractor", "/tmp/tmpd2acy52y", "https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/the-number-go-up-rule-why-america" ], "cmd_version": "0.0.11", "end_ts": "2025-09-15T23:03:47.084184+00:00", "index_texts": [ "Yesterday, the Wall Street Journal dropped a salacious story involving the relationship between Jeff Epstein and Donald Trump, one that is throwing the political world into a tizzy. And for good reason, it speaks to a two tier system of justice. One class in America is composed of billionaires and elites with super-yachts and no accountability, the other is composed of the rest of us who have to deal with increasingly enshittified goods and services. Just take a look at another headlines of the Wall Street Journal yesterday, and you\u2019ll notice in this headline the flip side of the Epstein story.Health care in America is insanely expensive, unpredictable, and often low quality. And yet it\u2019s going to get far pricier next year, largely because a network of monopolistic middlemen are pushing up costs. There\u2019s a gossipy angle here - Diddy apparently had pharmaceutical executives at his creepy events. But it\u2019s the impact on ordinary people that matters. Despite decades of popular anger, we just can\u2019t seem to do anything about health care costs and the people who foist them on us.Two other headlines from the WSJ yesterday are also worth mentioning. First, rail giant Union Pacific is considering buying Norfolk Southern, a historically important merger would harm farmers and shippers, and push up prices of food, energy, and a whole set of goods on which we rely. And second, Chevron is closing its deal for Hess, completing the consolidation of the oil sector, and they are going to move engineering work to India.Things in America, in other words, are getting worse, very quickly, for most of us, while a small group does quite well. The Epstein saga is just a gossipy way to convey that narrative. The question I want to ask in this piece is why that is.I started BIG in 2019 to describe the anti-monopoly movement, to get our thoughts out there. And it\u2019s been an unexpectedly successful journey: I didn\u2019t expect Biden to revive antitrust law, but he did, or for our ideas to be accepted, but they were. There are now monopolization cases against Apple, Amazon, Google, Ticketmaster, Meta, RealPage, John Deere, and so forth. I didn\u2019t think that Lina Khan would become a celebrity, or that millions of people would learn what the Federal Trade Commission is. And yet, over the past six months, that ascent has paused. The old enemy of equality - cynicism - has hit back, and hit back hard. We accomplished a lot over the last decade, but the basic architecture of American politics remains in place. And that architecture is characterized by one rule involving the stock market. The number must go up. That rule is ironclad, and it explains why things are increasingly enshittified. If you understand it, it will help predict what politicians like Donald Trump and business people like Apple CEO Tim Cook will do.The reason behind the rule is simple. The biggest generation in American history, the baby boomers, are still in power. Boomers have in aggregate $80-100 trillion in financial assets, far more than any other group. As a result they are culturally and politically dominant. The average American billionaire is a boomer in his early 60s. Donald Trump is a boomer, most of his key advisors are boomers, so is Democratic Senate chief Chuck Schumer. Key business leaders - like Apple CEO Tim Cook and JP Morgan CEO Jamie Dimon - are boomers, as are most CEOs of Hollywood studios, who have traditionally skewed younger. The average S&P 500 CEO is in his late 50s, and the number of young people serving on corporate boards keeps going down.Asset control and power in America is centered among old people with lots of assets. And they associate protecting the stock market with protecting America. The \u201cnumber go up\u201d rule is not a story of greed or economics, it\u2019s a story of how we make decisions as a society. Take the pandemic. Some of you might remember that right before Covid hit in force, I was freaking out. I pay attention to China, and it wasn\u2019t hard to imagine that a contagious disease would come here, and that the U.S. wouldn\u2019t handle it well, given thin supply chains and corrupt institutions. That seems obvious now, but at the time I was considered a little nuts. There was a moment, however, when the panic set in. And it wasn\u2019t when public health experts issued any warnings or when elected leaders spoke. It was when the stock market went down. Think about what that means. Covid was a giant society altering disease that forced multi-trillion dollar society-altering decisions while in the dark about its severity. And yet, until it became clear that it would affect capitalization of financial markets, it was not worth thinking about. Finance has become the lens through which our elites understand what is and is not a problem. If it affects \u201cnumber go up,\u201d it\u2019s worth solving. If not, it\u2019s just whining. Increasing the capitalization of the stock market at all costs has a number of implications about how our society works. Anything hindering short-term increases in profits, whether that\u2019s higher wages, more factory investment, ending tax loopholes, rules to block being able to unsubscribe from Planet Fitness, transitioning to different energy sources, addressing an opioid crisis, or breaking Chinese control over the necessities of life, gets pushed out of the way. American life spans have plateaued or stagnated since 2015, which you\u2019d think would be of concern. But it\u2019s just not. There\u2019s also something that distinguishes standard financial capitalism from \u2018number go up.\u2019 Financial capitalism implies risk. But in our era, the government guarantees financial returns with subsidies, regulations and bailouts. It\u2019s a form of statecraft.The observation of \u2018number go up\u2019 as a powerful guidepost for America is not original. Odd Lots host Joe Wiesenthal has often made this point, fingering the primacy of finance as the reason why America does not produce more housing or manufactured goods domestically. \u201cA stock market that continues to go up is part of the entire US economic model,\u201d he wrote. \u201cRising stocks are how we pay for retirement, education, consumption, and so forth\u2026 any impulse to abundantly build out less profitable lines of business undoubtedly strikes at the heart of how American capitalism works.\u201d Probably the most popular formulation of the \u2018number go up rule\u2019 is a famous New Yorker cartoon from 2012 showing children around a fire in a post-apocalyptic scene, with the caption \u201cYes, the planet got destroyed. But for a beautiful moment in time we created a lot of value for shareholders.\u201d As it turns out, Donald Trump obeys the number go up rule religiously. I watch CNBC every day, and from 9am to 10am, anchor Jim Cramer goes off on rants about the world. Based on conversations I\u2019ve had with people who know him, Cramer is a corrupt cynic who plays a character on TV. He name drops and talks to an endless number of CEOs, lavishing them publicly with praise, while attacking regulators who won\u2019t be his sources. Big business leaders understand that Cramer is speaking in code, saying publicly what they want out there. He lies, dissembles, makes terrible predictions, but he\u2019s the raw id of capital, and the perfect spokesman for this moment of baby boomer-run high finance dominance.During the Biden era, Cramer, like his counterparts at the Wall Street Journal editorial page, spent a lot of time attacking FTC Chair Lina Khan, because Khan was terrifying CEOs. It\u2019s not that she was doing much to harm them, she just didn\u2019t treat them differently than she treated anyone else. Big business leaders are used to being buttered up, being believed just because of who they are, having their banal observations taken as gospel. In meetings, Khan had the temerity to actually take them seriously, and ask for evidence or to respond to holes in their arguments. And they reacted with a collective, \u201cDo you know who I am?\u201dThese days, Cramer is practically jumping out of his chair with excitement. He is praising Trump, and explaining that Wall Street bankers tell him privately, off the record, that they think Trump is doing a great job. The most important prop to the stock market, he said, is that mergers are back on. \u201cAnyone can merge with anyone,\u201d he said joyfully. I doubt he knows the names of Trump antitrust enforcers, because they don\u2019t matter, and that\u2019s how things should be. One irony in Cramer\u2019s hatred of Khan is that Joe Biden obeyed the \u201cnumber go up\u201d mantra. His bank regulators bailed out Silicon Valley Bank, and the stock markets hit record highs, as Fed Chair Jay Powell and Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen did whatever they could to ensure that number go up. It was only in the corner of the world involving antitrust where that rule seemed to not apply. Still, that rule was poised to smash into antitrust; Kamala Harris was likely to fire Khan had she won the Presidency.When Trump was running for President in 2024, his framework was to increase tariffs, deport people en masse, all as a way to re-industrialize and hike wages. This model would fail, I believed, unless he was willing to accept that the stock market would have to go down. Someone had to absorb the costs of paying people more and building more factories, and that would have to occur through lower profits. In the first four or five months of his administration, I was surprised that Trump actually seemed serious, empowering advisors like Peter Navarro to engage in real protectionist policies. It was sloppy, but it was real. The markets went down, Wall Street panicked, and Trump seemed to enjoy it. \u201cSometimes you have to take medicine to fix something,\u201d he said.Had that attitude continued, the number go up paradigm would have been broken, and a host of problems previously considered just whining - like high health care costs and low quality - would have become solveable. But in April, Trump changed course. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick won an internal fight with Navarro, and ever since then, it\u2019s been Bessent running point on trade and economics, with Lutnick getting closer and closer to eliminating all antitrust action against big tech firms. It\u2019s not just economic policy, either. During the recent fights in the Middle East, the United States, Iran, and Israel were all extremely careful not to disturb financial markets. Today, no one on Wall Street thinks Trump is serious about hindering profits. As Cramer said, privately they note that they love this administration.Ultimately, number go up is a statement about what we value as a society. For hundreds of years, the key phrase describing value in America was the \u201cfruits of your labor,\u201d meaning that we understood it was from labor, came value. I noted this in my July 4th post, showing the history of American disdain for high finance, precisely because we believed that dignity meant respecting people who work for a living. \u201cLabor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration,\u201d said Abraham Lincoln in justifying the Union side in the Civil War.A key part of that framework was fostering a fair return on capital, which meant that people should make money from investments, but not too much. Too low meant no investment, but too high a return meant that we were allowing extraction from working people, which, if you look around, is exactly what a high stock market is doing. Ticketmaster\u2019s stock price is based on taking more from audience members and artists than it should get, just as UnitedHealth Group extracts from both doctors and patients.Today, our leaders see market capitalization as good, instead of a sign of weakness. It\u2019s not just Donald Trump, whose policy framework basically seems to be moving as much capital as possible into data centers, in the hopes that will keep number going up. Here\u2019s Silicon Valley Democrat Ro Khanna, bragging about multi-trillion dollar firms in his district. Rather than understand excessive returns as extractive, he thinks high finance is good. I don\u2019t mean to pick on Khanna, he\u2019s smart, but it\u2019s precisely because he\u2019s smart that his arguments expose the real values at work. Number must go up.The number go up model moment reminds me of the archival research I did on the roaring 1920s, with its deep reservoir of fatigue at the idea of do-gooderism, at the prevalence of scams, gambling, liquor, and celebrated immorality, with a backdrop of a financial market moving endlessly higher. Only this time, the 2020s is run by baby boomers who are protecting their financial assets. So we should probably call it the Booming Twenties.Two other deeply corrupt trends characterize what is turning into a very wicked and evil time. The first is crypto, and the second is the widespread legalization of gambling. I said my piece about crypto in 2021 - it\u2019s a necessary scam, similar to the Florida land value speculation of the 1920s. Crypto is not a useful technology, it\u2019s a bet on disillusionment and corruption, a belief in hustle bro culture. I know lobbyists for crypto, and they are deeply cynical, often full of rage at people who do not accept dirty money and seek to build a moral society based on political equality. I thought crypto would go away after Sam Bankman-Fried went to jail, but Biden SEC Chair Gary Gensler approved a massive inflow of cash into bitcoin, and that was that. Crypto is a good metaphor for the 2020s, because it is pure speculation. The financial derivatives that led to the 2008 crisis were too far from real business activity, referencing mortgages or corporate bonds. But crypto references nothing at all, just memes. Largely because of hundreds of millions of dollars of campaign contributions, mostly to Republicans, it is now a multi-trillion dollar financial system that will end in tears. Private equity and big tech are bigger and more extractive than crypto, but is floating along the same cultural trend line of \u201cnumber go up.\u201d \u201cWhen the capital development of a country becomes a by-product of the activities of a casino,\u201d economist and philosopher John Maynard Keynes once wrote, \u201cthe job is likely to be ill-done.\u201d That was true in the 1920s, it\u2019s true today.Another signpost is the widespread acceptance of corporate \u201capp based\u201d gambling, which is destroying the lives of millions of people. We\u2019re not talking about making a bet with a friend on a game, or playing a round of poker, we\u2019re talking highly extractive sophisticated corporations spending billions of dollars, geo-targeting addicts with advertising. They are preying on teenagers, and financing and corrupting the entire apparatus of what used to be a collective shared cultural commons - sports. And yet, there\u2019s virtually no opposition to systemized gambling, even from the church.A society under \u201cnumber go up\u201d tends towards evil. The men and women behind an excessively high rate of return often make deeply sinful and immoral choices, little different than the Confederate plantation owners did in whipping slaves or lords in castles did when abusing serfs. That they do it with spreadsheets doesn\u2019t make it better. (We even use old terminology: I know of several people in a large health insurance conglomerate who set policies to deny care whose nickname is \u201cthe three witches.\u201d)And that\u2019s why Jeff Epstein\u2019s story is so compelling, it expresses this evil in a way that we all understand. On Sunday, I wrote about the oddness of the story, how an elite sex trafficker convicted of procuring children as prostitutes was friends or associates with everyone from Trump to Bill Clinton to Larry Summers to Bill Gates. Epstein represents how elites live in one moral universe where evil bacchanalia is rampant, while the rest of us live in a different more normal one. Every society has elites, and there are always weird things that elites do. But America, and the West, have reached a point where there is increasingly deep resentment and cynicism about this divide. \u201cNumber go up\u201d will end. Everything does. It will likely end in a giant crash or real war, but there are peaceful political offramps, since it is not very popular. In 2006, 2008, 2010, 2014, 2016, 2018, 2020, 2022, and 2024, Americans voted for change. A month ago, young people in New York City elected a Democratic socialist as their mayoral candidate who said billionaires should not exist, which is a very clear revolt against a system where wealth is held by a few people in older generations. High rents and a high cost of living might help market capitalization, but they are, to most people, problems. We\u2019ve done it before, and recently. Throughout the 20th century, key challenges to equality had to do with racism, or sexism, or homophobia. There were just lots of bad things - like harassing secretaries - that were understood as the way things were. It\u2019s not that all of that behavior is over, any more than we have stopped all theft or murder, but the social norms have changed. In the early 1990s, fewer than half of Americans approved of interracial marriage between blacks and whites. Just a decade later, it was 76%, today it\u2019s 96%. Something similar likely happened with gay marriage, and opposition to sexual harassment in the work place. We overcame our long and horrible lack of belief in social equality, one that bedeviled us since the 1700s. The new moral challenge we have as a society is, in a sense, a much older one. We have to get back to seeing the vices laid out in most ancient religious traditions - gambling, speculation, greed, and a disdain for those who work for a living. As FDR put it in 1936, \u201cWe had to struggle with the old enemies of peace\u2014business and financial monopoly, speculation, reckless banking, class antagonism, sectionalism, war profiteering.\u201dAs we organize for that time, building the arguments and the coalitions, understand that the one ironclad rule guiding elite decision-making in the Booming Twenties is number go up. That runs our social order, and that\u2019s what we\u2019re really up against.Thanks for reading! Your tips make this newsletter what it is, so please send me tips on weird monopolies, stories I\u2019ve missed, or other thoughts. And if you liked this issue of BIG, you can sign up here for more issues, a newsletter on how to restore fair commerce, innovation, and democracy. Consider becoming a paying subscriber to support this work, or if you are a paying subscriber, giving a gift subscription to a friend, colleague, or family member. If you really liked it, read my book, Goliath: The 100-Year War Between Monopoly Power and Democracy.cheers,Matt Stoller" ], "output": "readability/", "pwd": "/data/archive/1757977388.146273", "schema": "ArchiveResult", "start_ts": "2025-09-15T23:03:40.572472+00:00", "status": "succeeded" } ], "screenshot": [], "singlefile": [], "title": [ { "cmd": [ "/usr/bin/curl", "--silent", "--location", "--compressed", "--proxy", "socks5://tor-socks-proxy:9150", "--max-time", "60", "--user-agent", "Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/128.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 ArchiveBox/{VERSION} (+https://github.com/ArchiveBox/ArchiveBox/)", "https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/the-number-go-up-rule-why-america" ], "cmd_version": "8.10.1", "end_ts": "2025-09-15T23:03:39.905268+00:00", "index_texts": null, "output": "The Number Go Up Rule: Why America Refuses to Fix Anything", "pwd": "/data/archive/1757977388.146273", "schema": "ArchiveResult", "start_ts": "2025-09-15T23:03:39.827053+00:00", "status": "succeeded" } ], "wget": [] }, "icons": null, "is_archived": true, "is_static": false, "latest": { "archive_org": "ArchiveError: Failed to find \"content-location\" URL header in Archive.org response.", "dom": "output.html", "favicon": "favicon.ico", "git": null, "media": "ArchiveError: Failed to save media", "pdf": null, "screenshot": null, "singlefile": null, "title": "The Number Go Up Rule: Why America Refuses to Fix Anything", "warc": null, "wget": null }, "link_dir": "/data/archive/1757977388.146273", "newest_archive_date": "2025-09-15T23:04:15.451011+00:00", "num_failures": 2, "num_outputs": 7, "oldest_archive_date": "2025-09-15T23:03:14.629144+00:00", "path": "/p/the-number-go-up-rule-why-america", "schema": "Link", "scheme": "https", "snapshot_abid": "snp_01K57SW94T6EC390DF01ERPV64", "snapshot_id": "43473324-5ddb-4b88-9d73-e1a09d8b6cc4", "sources": [ "/data/sources/1757977386-import.txt" ], "tags": null, "tags_str": "", "timestamp": "1757977388.146273", "title": "The Number Go Up Rule: Why America Refuses to Fix Anything", "url": "https://www.thebignewsletter.com/p/the-number-go-up-rule-why-america" }